Featured

O&M of Rural Infrastructure in CDD and Community-Based Projects

Operations and Maintenance of Rural Infrastructure in Community-Driven Development and Community-Based Projects

Lessons Learned and Case Studies of Good Practice

World Bank Group: By Andreas Salomonsen and Myrtle Diachok: June 29, 2015

Executive Summary

The World Bank encourages the use of community-driven development  (CDD) and
community-based approaches to build rural infrastructure in some of the world’s poorest countries and communities. Over the past  10 years, CDD projects and components have constituted between 5 and 10 percent of World Bank lending. CDD emphasizes community control over decision making and investment resources for local infrastructure and service delivery. The approach has significantly increased access to community infrastructure and services such as roads, irrigation, water and sanitation, electricity, basic education, and health (Wong 2012). CDD is widely used in the least-developed countries of the world and in fragile and post conflict contexts, and is often used by middle-income countries to reach the poorest or most marginalized populations. Given the levels of investment and the importance CDD plays in  extending basic services, particularly to the poor, continued operation and maintenance (O&M)
of the basic investments supported under CDD (and other community-based operations) is a logical concern that has been raised by both practitioners and critics (OED 2005).

This paper highlights examples of successful O&M arrangements under community-
driven and -based development projects to better understand the factors contributing to their success. The intended beneficiaries of this assessment are client governments implementing CDD and community-based projects for similar types of rural infrastructure, task teams, and other potential users.  In addition to highlighting factors of success, this paper shares relevant materials, procedures, and guidelines to help support O&M systems.

This paper is based on a desk review of World Bank operational documents as well as
external literature on O&M related to rural infrastructure across several sectors. The seven project cases analyzed for this review were selected based on evidence of successful O&M arrangements from a longer list of more than 50 projects compiled by members of the CDD Community of Practice (COP) and World Bank staff from the water, social protection, and transport sectors. The  desk review of relevant project documents was supplemented by discussions with task team members and government project staff. The seven case study projects include:

  • Afghanistan National Solidarity Program (NSP 1, 2 and 3)
  • Azerbaijan Rural Investment Projects (1 and 2)
  • India Punjab Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project
  • Indonesia National Program for Community Empowerment in Rural Areas (PNPM Rural),
  • Nepal Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Projects (1 and 2)
  • Peru Rural Roads Program (1-3)
  • The Philippines’ KALAHI Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Services/National CDD Project

The review found four critical factors for O&M success, and these areas serve as the analytical framework for this paper.

  1. Organizational and institutional arrangements: Comprising the organizational structure and roles and responsibilities for operating and maintaining the infrastructure at the community and local administration levels.
  2. Capacity building: High-quality, timely training.
  3. Financing: Revenue collection and cost-sharing mechanisms, and willingness and ability to pay.
  4. Technical considerations: Design and technology choices, and complexity.

To Read full document/download, Click the link below:

O&M of Rural Infrastructure in CDD & Community Based Projects

 

Advertisements
Featured

Gold Future Policy Award 2017

Gold Future Policy Award 2017

WINNER GOLD AWARD

Ethiopia, Tigray Region:

Conservation-Based Agricultural Development-Led Industrialization (ADLI, 1994), supported by Mass Mobilization Campaigns (1991) and Youth Responsive Land Policy (2008).

Hamburg/ Bonn/Ordos – 22 August 2017 – More people, less erosion – Ethiopia’s Tigray region demonstrates that this can be a reality: Ethiopia’s Tigray region will take home the Gold Future Policy Award 2017, beating 26 other nominated policies to the prize. Also known as “Oscar for Best Policies,” the Future Policy Award highlights the world’s best policies that combat desertification and land degradation this year. With unique collective action, voluntary labour and the involvement of youth, the people of Tigray are restoring land on a massive scale. As a result, erosion has decreased significantly, groundwater levels are recharged, and the uptake of sustainable agricultural practices made a significant contribution to food self-sufficiency and economic growth.

Ethiopia, Tigray Region: Conservation-Based Agricultural Development-Led Industrialization (ADLI, 1994), supported by Mass Mobilization Campaigns (1991) and the Youth Responsive Land Policy (2008). The Tigray region’s interpretation of Ethiopia’s development strategy focuses on food self-sufficiency and economic growth by conserving land and promoting sustainable agriculture. Thanks to a unique combination of collective action, voluntary labour and the involvement of youth, the people of Tigray are restoring land on a massive scale.

”The Tigray region of Ethiopia is now greener than it has ever been during the last 145 years. This is not due to an increase in rainfall, but due to human investment in restoring degraded land to productivity. Large-scale restoration under harsh environmental conditions (steep slopes,  poor soils) was possible because the regional government of Tigray decided to make restoration a pillar of its development strategy. It developed a set of good policies, and the people of Tigray were mobilized to invest their labour in restoration activities. In about 15 years, men, women and children moved at least 90 million tonnes of soil and rock by hand to restore their landscapes on about 1 million hectares. In the process many communities have overcome the impacts of climate change.“   Chris Reij, Senior Fellow, World Resources Institute
For more information: 
Visit UNCCD website:  http://www.unccd.int
To read/download click the link: Future Policy Award 2017_Brochure
 To view some documented video use the links below:
Tigray: Then and Now
The Watershed movement in Tigray
Regreening the valley of Tigray

 

 

 

 

Featured

Soil and Water Conservation in Ethiopia: GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT AGENTS

Guidelines for Development Agents:

Soil and Water Conservation in Ethiopia

Hurni H, Berhe WA, Chadhokar P, Daniel D, Gete Z, Grunder M, Kassaye G. 2016

Preface

The “Guidelines for development agents on soil conservation in Ethiopia” has been in use for 30 years; its translation into the Amharic language was published in 1987 and the book was reprinted in 1995. Thousands of copies were handed on to development agents, technicians and experts, some of whom sent comments and proposed more technologies based on their field experience. Since 2003, another reprinting was enthusiastically demanded by the regions, which organised region-wide campaigns in soil and water conservation that are still ongoing. At the federal level, the Ministry of Agriculture prepared a number of guidelines and policies for sustainable land management, to which this book is now added.

This 2nd edition has been revised in response to the above suggestions and requests. It is dedicated to the late Karlheinz Boehm (1928-2014), Dr h.c. mult., founder of Menschen für Menschen (MfM), with whom I collaborated closely from 1985 until he retired from active work. The revision was done in a collaborative effort of the Ministry of Agriculture, the Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) of the University of Bern, and the Water and Land Resource Centre (WLRC) in Addis Abeba, which has initiated sustainable land management activities in many ‘learning watersheds’ in the Eastern Nile Basin in recent years. Today, soil and water conservation measures are not only socially accepted and integrated

in most farming systems; they are also economically viable from a 30-year. perspective, as a detailed study on the economics of land degradation in the Ethiopian Highlands has shown (Kaspar Hurni et al. 2015). Despite all the successes observed, however, only about 18% of the rainfed croplands have so far been treated with soil and water conservation measures. If we consider that 77% of the rainfed croplands have slopes steeper than 8%, there is a need to further apply measures on nearly 60% of all croplands, i.e. nearly 12 million hectares still have to be treated. It is for these activities that this book is being reprinted, enhanced by complementary information based on more recent experiences.

Hans Hurni

Dr phil.-nat. and Dr h.c., Initiator of the Soil Conservation Research Programme (1981-1998), Founding president of the Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern

For full document use the click the link below:

Guidelines_Soil_and_Water_Conservation_in_Ethiopia_2016

Please use the following for citation:

Citation: Hurni H, Berhe WA, Chadhokar P, Daniel D, Gete Z, Grunder M, Kassaye G. 2016. Soil and Water Conservation in Ethiopia: Guidelines for Development Agents. Second revised edition. Bern, Switzerland: Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, with Bern Open Publishing (BOP). 134 pp
Please Use the Leave a Reply box below pages for any comment or feedback.
Featured

Agricultural Transformation Agenda Annual Report 2015-2016

Agricultural Transformation Agenda Annual Report 2015-2016
Overview

Over the past decade, Ethiopia has made tremendous economic progress to become one of the fastest growing countries in the world. Between 2005 and 2015, the country’s GDP more than quadrupled from 12.4 billion USD to 55.6 billion USD, compared to the more moderate increase of 63% from 7.6 billion USD to 12.4 billion USD in the previous ten years (1995 to 2005). This growth was fueled by widespread institutional and policy reforms carried out by the Government of Ethiopia (GoE) across all major sectors (education, health, water, transport and telecommunications), but particularly in agriculture, which forms the backbone of the national economy. These reforms have gone a long way toward reducing the number of Ethiopians living in poverty: in 1995 nearly 79% of the population was living in poverty, a figure that has been slashed by more than half to 34% 20 years later.

This remarkable progress notwithstanding, Ethiopia’s agriculture sector remains paradoxically underdeveloped. As the largest component of the economy, agriculture employs a majority of the Ethiopian population. The majority of these are smallholder farmers practicing subsistence farming on less than one hectare of land. Furthermore, the country is not exploiting effectively its vast natural resources, as less than half of all arable land is currently under cultivation (15% versus 36% of total land area). Additionally, a majority of the agricultural activity is environmentally unsustainable and relies on annual rainfall despite the availability of abundant water sources.

Nonetheless, considerable and continued investments by the Government have succeeded in helping farmers increase their crop production and productivity, adopt yield-enhancing inputs, and leverage community organizations like cooperatives to aggregate produce so that farmers can benefit from economies of scale. Recent economic gains have also made Ethiopia an attractive destination for foreign direct investment. Coupled with the wide range of crops (over 100) that can be cultivated across the country’s varied agro-ecological zones and climates, there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic about future agricultural developments.

The GoE’s primary development target is to reach middle income country status by 2025, an aspiration that requires serious attention to be paid to the existing systemic bottlenecks hindering further agricultural growth. In addition, agriculture must serve as the basis for industrialization in order to reap maximum rewards from the country’s comparative advantages in producing raw materials. For example, coffee, sesame and vegetables – the country’s top agricultural exports – account for a combined 1.4 billion USD in annual earnings, but could fetch far more after agro-processing for value addition than they do as raw materials. Capitalizing on these agro-processing opportunities, however, requires addressing challenges along the entire value chain, including: limited transportation and processing infrastructure; insufficient aggregation and storage capacity; outdated farming techniques yielding lower quality outputs; low input use; and high vulnerability to climate change and extreme weather events, such as the 2015 El Niño phenomenon.

In light of these circumstances, the Government has set out clear objectives to transform the agriculture sector, and the economy as a whole, in successive Growth and Transformation Plans (GTPs).

Click the link below to read or download full document:

ATA Report 2015-16

 

 

 

 

Featured

የተፈጥሮ ሀብት ልማት፣ ጥበቃና አጠቃቀም ዋና የሥራ ሂደት

የተፈጥሮ ሀብት ልማት፣ ጥበቃና አጠቃቀም ዋና የሥራ ሂደት ተግባርና ኃላፊነት

በዓለም አቀፍ ደረጃም ሆነ በሀገር ደረጃ የተከሰቱ አዳዲስ ለውጦችን ግምት ውስጥ በማስገባት በተለያዩ የአገራችን አካባቢዎች በተፈጥሮ ሀብት ሥራዎች በተለይም በአፈርና ውሃ ጥበቃ ሥራዎች የተፈጠረውን ከፍተኛ የህዝብ ንቅናቄ በዘላቂነት ለማስቀጠል የሚያስችል የአሰራር ሥርዓት በመዘርጋት ሥራዎች ይበልጥ የጥራት ደረጃቸውን ጠብቀው እንዲከናወኑ፣ የተፋሰስ ልማት ሥራዎች ከግብርና ልማት ሥራዎች ጋር በተቀናጀና ተደጋጋፊነት ባለው መልኩ እንዲተገበሩ፣ በግብርናው ሴክተር ለአየር ንብረት ለውጥ አይበገሬ አረንጓዴ ኢኮኖሚ ስትራቴጂ ከሌሎች ሴክተሮች ጋር በቅንጅት ተግባራዊ ለማድረግና ሥራውን በብቃት ለመምራት እንዲሁም በነባሩ የሥራ ሂደት ትግበራ የተስተዋሉ ክፍተቶችን፣ ከጊዜ ወደጊዜ እያደገ የመጣውን የተገልጋዮችና የባለድርሻ አካላት ፍላጎት መሠረት በማድረግ ቀልጣፋና ውጤታማ የአሰራርና የአገልግሎት አሰጣጥ ሥርዓት ለመዘርጋት እንዲቻል የተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝ ዋና የሥራ ሂደትን በአዲስ መልክ በዳይሬክቶሬት ደረጃ ማደራጀት አስፈላጊ ሆኖ የተገኘ ሲሆን ተጠሪነቱ ለተፈጥሮ ሀብት ዘርፍ ሆኖ የሚከተሉትን ተግባርና ኃላፊነቶች ያከናውናል፡፡

  1. በገጠር ልማት ፖሊሲና ስትራቴጂ ላይ የተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝ ለማጠናከር የሚያግዙ አዋጆች፣ ሕጎች፣ ደንቦችና መመሪያዎችን ማዘጋጀትና ማጸደቅ፣ አዳዲስ የፖሊሲ ሀሣቦችን ማመንጨት፣ ሲፈቀዱም ከክልሎች ጋር በቅንጅት ተግባራዊ እንዲደረጉ ማገዝ፣ አፈፃፀማቸውንም መከታተል፣
  2. የተፋሰስን መርህ የተከተለና የተጠቃሚውን ህብረተሰብ በንቃት ባሳተፈ መልኩ በተለያዩ ተፋሰሶች የባዮፊዚካል፣ ማህበራዊና ኢኮኖሚያዊ መረጃዎች በማሰባሰብና በመተንተን ያሉትን የልማት ችግሮችና አለኝታዎች በመለየት ከህብረተሰቡ ፍላጎትና ከአየካባቢዎቹ ተጨባጭ ሁኔታዎች ጋር የተገናዘበ የተቀናጀ የተፋሰስ ልማት ዕቅድ ከተጠቃሚ ክልሎች ጋር በቅንጅት በማዘጋጀት ተግባራዊ እንዲደረግ ድጋፍ መስጠት፣
  3. በተፋሰስ ልማት፣ በማህበረሰብ ሥራዎች እና በአየር ንብረት አይበገሬ አረንጓዴ ኢኮኖሚ ስትራቴጂ ላይ ያተኮረ በየደረጃው የሚገኙ ባለሙያዎችን ዕውቀትና ክህሎት በማሳደግ የመፈፀም ብቃታቸውን ለማጎልበትና በየደረጃው የሚታዩ የአቅም ክፍተቶችን በመለየት የሚስተዋሉ የአቅም ክፍተቶችን ለመሙላት የሚያስችሉ የአሰልጣኞች ሥልጠናዎችን መስጠት፣ አገር አቀፍ ዐውደ-ጥናቶችና ሴሚናሮች ማካሄድ፣
  4. ከየአግሮ-ኢኮሎጂ ቀጠናዎችና ከህብረተሰቡ ፍላጎት ጋር የተጣጣሙ ዘላቂ የተቀናጀ የተፋሰስ ልማት ለማካሄድ የሚያስችሉ ተስማሚ የቴክኖሎጊ ውጤቶችንና ውጤታማ የሆኑ አሰራሮችን መረጃ በማሰባሰብና በመቀመር የቴክኒክ አሰራር መመሪያዎችን/ማኑዋሎችን፣ በራሪ ፅሁፎቸንና ፖስተሮችን ማዘጋጀትና ማሰራጨት፤
  5. በዘመናዊ የኢንፎርሜሽን ቴክኖሎጅዎችና ፓኬጆች የታገዘ የተፈጥሮ ሀብት መረጃዎችን በማሰባሰብና ትንተና በማካሄድ ዘመናዊና ቀልጣፋ የመረጃ አያያዝና ልዉዉጥ ሥርዓትን በመዘርጋት መረጃዎችን በዳታ ቤዝ የመያዝ አቅምን ማጎልበት፤
  6. ለግብርና ምርትና ምርታማነት መቀነስ ምክንያት የሆኑትን የአፈር መሸርሸር፣ የአፈር ለምነት መቀነስና የመሬት መናድ/መደርመስ/ እንዲሁም ለጎርፍ አደጋ ተጋለጭ የሆኑ አካባቢዎችን በመለየት የአፈር ለምነትን መመናመን ችግር ያለባቸዉና የተራቆቱ አካባቢዎች መልሰዉ እንዲያገግሙና የለምነት ደረጃቸዉን በማሻሻል ለምርት ተግባር እነዲዉሉ፣ምርታማ አካባቢዎችን ደግሞ በከፍተኛ ደረጃ ጥቅም የሚሰጡበትን ስልት በመንደፍ ከክልሎች ጋር በቅንጅት ተግባራዊ ማድረግ፣አፈፃፀሙን መከታተል፤
  7. ዘላቂ የተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝና አጠቃቀምን በማስፈን ለግብርና ልማት ምቹ የአካባቢ ሁኔታ በመፍጠር ምርትና ምርታማነትን ለማሳደግ የሚያግዙ ፕሮግራሞችንና ፕሮጀክቶችን ማዘጋጀት፣ ሲፈቀዱም ተግባራዊነታችዉን መከታተልና ማስተባበር፣
  8. በተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝና አጠቃቀም ህብረተሰቡንና በየደረጃዉ የሚገኙ ፈፃሚ አካላትን በንቃት ያሳተፈ የተጠናከረ የክትትል ግምገማ ሥርዓትን በመዘርጋት የተሻለ የአፈፃፀም ዉጤት እንዲመዘገብ የተቀናጀ ጥረት ማድረግና የተሻለ ዉጤት ያስገኙ የተሻሻሉ አሰራሮችን ልምድ መረጃ በማሰባሰብና በመቀመር ወደሌሎች ተመሳሳይ የአግሮኢኮሎጅ ቀጠናዎች /አካባቢዎች/ እንዲስፋፉ የቴክኒክ ድጋፍ ማድረግ፤
  9. በተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝና አጠቃቀም ዙሪያ ሀገሪቱ የተቀበለችዉን /የፈረመችባችዉን አህጉራዊ ዓለም ዓቀፋዊ ስምምነቶችን ከሚመለከታችዉ አካላት ጋር በቅንጅት ተግባራዊ መደረጋችዉን ማረጋገጥና ሀገሪቱ የምታገኘዉን ጥቅም ማጎልበት፤
  10. ዘላቂ የተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝና አጠቃቀምን ለማጠናከር የሚያችችሉ የቴክኒክ ምክርና ድጋፎችን በተለይ ልዩ ድጋፍ ለሚሹ ክልሎች መስጠት፤
  11. ከተለያዩ አካላት የተፋሰስ ልማትንና ለአየር ንብረት አይበገሬ አረንጓዴ ኢኮኖሚን በሚመለከት አስተያየት እንዲሰጥባችዉ የሚመጡ የተለያዩ ዶክመንቶች /ጉዳዬች ላይ አስተያየት የመስጠትና የምክር ድጋፍ የማድረግ፤
  12. በግብርና ሚኒስቴር በኩል የአየር ንብረት ለዉጥን ለመቋቋም የሚረዱ ሥራዎችና ጥረቶችን ማስተባበር፣ መከታተል፣ ለተግባራዊነታቸዉ ድጋፍ መስጠትና ዉጤታማነታቸዉን በመገምገም የማሻሻያ ሀሣቦችን መጠቆም፤

በተፈጥሮ ሀብት አያያዝ ዋና የሥራ ሂደት ሥር ተጠሪነታቸው በቀጥታ ለዋና የሥራ ሂደት ሆኖ በሥሩ የተፋሰስ ልማት፣ የማህበረሰብ ሥራዎች ማስተባበሪያ እና ለአየር ንብረት ለውጥ አይበገሬ አረንጓዴ ኢኮኖሚ ኬዝ ቲሞችን በመያዝ የተደራጀ ነው፡፡

BAMBOO CULTIVATION MANUAL – GUIDELINES FOR CULTIVATING ETHIOPIAN HIGHLAND BAMBOO

BAMBOO CULTIVATION MANUAL – GUIDELINES FOR CULTIVATING ETHIOPIAN HIGHLAND BAMBOO

The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) – 2009

INTRODUCTION

This manual provides basic information about Ethiopia’s highland bamboo species, and thereby aims to increase public awareness about this important natural resource. Practical guidelines for cultivating and managing highland bamboo are offered herein to help growers establish new plantations and manage existing bamboo stands.

The highland bamboo species is botanically known as Yushania alpina. This species grows naturally in ecological zones of the country between 2200 – 3500 meters above sea level. The coverage of this species in Ethiopia was roughly estimated in 1997 to be about 130,000 hectares. Over the last 10 years, the resource base has been significantly reduced because large areas of indigenous bamboo forests have been cleared for conversion to agriculture. This is the case in the highland areas of the country within a 200 km perimeter of Addis Ababa.  

Alpine bamboo has traditionally been used as a material for making fences and water pipes, as well as a variety of handicrafts. The culms are used by cottage industries for woven and plaited products such as basketry, mats, and other decorative items. 

In recent years, Y. alpina has been used for manufacturing industrial products such as parquet flooring, window blinds, and curtains.  The plant is also useful for bio-energy.

To read/download click the link be;ow:

Guidelines_for_cultivating_Ethiopian_highland_bamboo_2009

BAMBOO CULTIVATION MANUAL – GUIDELINES FOR CULTIVATING ETHIOPIAN LOWLAND BAMBOO

BAMBOO CULTIVATION MANUAL – GUIDELINES FOR CULTIVATING ETHIOPIAN LOWLAND BAMBOO

 The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) = 2009

INTRODUCTION

This manual provides basic information about Ethiopia’s lowland bamboo species, and thereby aims to increase public awareness about this important natural resource. Practical guidelines for cultivating and managing lowland bamboo species are offered herein to help growers establish new plantations and manage existing bamboo forests.

The lowland bamboo species is botanically known as Oxytenanthera abyssinica. It is a clump forming, solid stemmed bamboo that is widely distributed in the dry regions in the western part of Ethiopia. Since ancient times, this woody plant has been a vital resource for communities living in the semi-arid regions of the country. It has traditionally been used as a raw material for building and it has also been used for making numerous household utensils, basketry, and handicrafts. It is also a plant with nutritional value: young bamboo shoots can be cooked and eaten as a vegetable, and the foliage can be used as animal fodder. Bamboo is a fast growing woody plant, and as such, it is a renewable source of fuel which has a heating value comparable to that of timber from trees.

In Ethiopia, lowland bamboo naturally occurs and thrives in areas where living conditions are extremely harsh. The bamboo forests in the western side of Ethiopia are breeding grounds for malaria mosquitoes and tsetse flies. The grave risk posed to human populations, livestock, and domestic animals has compelled farming communities to settle at a distance from bamboo resources. Despite the risks involved, dependence on the bamboo raw material drives local people to go into the forests to extract culms for their domestic requirements.

To read/download Click the link below: 

Guidelines_for_cultivating_Ethiopian_lowland_bamboo_2009

Guidelines for Growing Bamboo

Guidelines for Growing Bamboo

(Bernard N. Kigomo- KEFRI Guideline Series: No. 4 – April 2007)

INTRODUCTION

During the last century, forests were mainly assessed in terms of the commercial value of timber. Rarely were other forest components considered to be of major economic importance. In the 1900s, when vast areas of tropical forests were denuded of timber for local use and exportation, bamboos and other non-wood products were usually discarded or destroyed during logging operations.

In the 21st  century, however, there is a growing consensus that non-wood forest products are not only crucial to ecosystems but also invaluable to the livelihood of communities. Non-wood forest products are known to generate substantial foreign exchange and are increasingly being regarded as valuable commodities around the world. Our perception and evaluation of non-wood forest products is changing due to alarming rates of deforestation and decreased timber yields.

The government of Kenya has, for instance, formulated policies to address the state of low supply of wood products. A ban on logging was declared in most of the forests in the country and awareness campaigns on the importance of forests and forest conservation were undertaken by non-governmental organizations. In Kenya, policy makers have also focused on the importance of non-wood products and services and their economic potential as alternative sources of revenue. Similar initiatives have been made by other East African Governments.

Among the most important minor forest products, bamboo has continued to gain recognition. Once upon a time, bamboo was regarded as a weed; today it is considered as a multipurpose plant and as a valuable timber substitute. It is much sought after for use in horticultural fl ower farming, handicraft, residential fencing and other minor cottage industry products like toothpicks, basket making and match sticks. Bamboo raw materials are however scarce due to the current ban on bamboo extraction from public forests. Even if the ban were to be lifted, the cover of bamboo resource is presently low due to excisions of indigenous forests where bamboo was dominant. This calls for production of raw materials from farms not only to ensure expanded supply, but also to get the materials nearer to the market yards where handicraft industries are fl ourishing. Increased availability of materials would also provide for the fast expanding horticultural fl ower farming.

Most of the bamboo resources in Kenya comprise one indigenous species, Yushania alpina, which was formerly known as Arundinaria alpina. This species, which is commonly known as “alpine bamboo”, occurs naturally on the main mountains and highland ranges of Kenya and eastern Africa. The species is estimated to cover between 145,000 – 150,000 ha, located mainly at altitudes ranging from 2400 m to about 3400 m above sea level.

In Ethiopia the species is estimated to cover 120,000 – 130,000 ha. With the exception of a few clumps of the species left on farms by farmers living around forest areas in the highlands, where the species grow naturally, little cultivation of this species has been done in both countries. Such farmers are keen to undertake planting themselves, but face problems with establishment and the lack of effective management interventions.

In addition to Yushania alpina, Ethiopia has a huge resource base of what is commonly called lowland bamboo or Oxytenanthera abyssinica.  The species occurs at elevations of 300 – 700 meters and with rainfall of 300 – 800 mm/year (Treville and Kigomo, 1992).  This species is estimated to cover between 750,000 – 900,000 ha in Ethiopia (LUSO- Consult, 1997).  There have been no formal attempts of managing or domesticating this species (Kigomo, 1997).  Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda also have this species but at a much lower area cover.  Oxytenanthera abyssinica  is also distributed in isolated pockets between 12-13 degrees latitude, from Ethiopia to Senegal in the north, and Mozambique across to Angola in the south.

During the last twenty years, some research on species selection and investigations on their growth was done mainly by the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) in collaboration with several Asian research and development institutions. This research work has introduced over twenty Asian bamboo species into the country. Half of these are successfully growing in the field under various ecological conditions. Appendix 1 lists  some bamboo species successfully introduced in Kenya. The introduced species are more versatile and can be cultivated in areas where the local bamboo does not thrive. Background information about the origin and habitat of some of these species is provided in Appendix 2.  These species can be cultivated in parts of Africa with similar growing conditions. Farmers, horticultural flower farming companies, and the Forest Department have expressed great interest in growing these bamboo species on their land, but no harmonized methods have been introduced to ensure that projected outputs are successfully achieved.

The situation of bamboo in Kenya is paradigmatic for much of tropical Africa. Governments, NGOs, and private enterprises in many African countries are developing initiatives to promote the cultivation of bamboo as an industrial crop. Whilst these guidelines on bamboo plantation management have been developed in response to a specific need in Kenya, it is thought that they will be useful in other parts of the continent.

To read/download use this link: Guidelines for Growing Bamboo

LAND RESTORATION IN FOOD SECURITY PROGRAMMES (ETHIOPIA): SYNERGIES WITH CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION

Land Restoration in Food Security Programmes: Synergies with Climate Change Mitigation

Dominic Woolf, Dawit Solomon and Johannes Lehmann, January 2018

ABSTRACT

Food-insecure households in many countries depend on international aid to alleviate acute shocks and chronic shortages. Some food security programmes (including Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program–PSNP – which provides a case study for this article) have integrated aid in exchange for labour on public works to reduce long-term dependence by investing in the productive capacity and resilience of communities. Using this approach, Ethiopia has embarked upon an ambitious national programme of land restoration and sustainable land management. Although the intent was to reduce poverty, here we show that an unintended co-benefit is the climate-change mitigation from reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and increased landscape carbon stocks. The article first shows that the total reduction in net GHG emissions from PSNP’s land management at the national scale is estimated at 3.4 million Mg CO2e y-1 – approximately 1.5% of the emissions reductions in Ethiopia’s Nationally Determined Contribution for the Paris Agreement. The article then explores some of the opportunities and constraints to scaling up of this impact.

KEY POLICY INSIGHTS

  • Food security programmes (FSPs) can contribute to climate change mitigation by creating a vehicle for investment in land and ecosystem restoration.
  • Maximizing mitigation, while enhancing but not compromising food security, requires that climate projections, and mitigation and adaptation responses should be mainstreamed into planning and implementation of FSPs at all levels.
  • Cross-cutting oversight is required to integrate land restoration, climate policy, food security and disaster risk management into a coherent policy framework.
  • Institutional barriers to optimal implementation should be addressed, such as incentive mechanisms that reward effort rather than results, and lack of centralized monitoring and evaluation of impacts on the physical environment.
  • Project implementation can often be improved by adopting best management practices, such as using productive living livestock barriers where possible, and increasing the integration of agroforestry and non-timber forest products into landscape regeneration. 

    For more information:

        Visit the link to view and download the document and other similar papers:

        Land Restoration in FS

 OR

       Click the link below to Download as PDF:

         Download.pdf

ArcGIS Training Manual – 2018

ArcGIS Training Manual – 2 (2018)

This ArcGis training manual is prepared to assist a training to regional staffs on the practical application of GIS software in work place. The training will help staffs in managing and updating MIS or mapped data base systems that will be established in the near future. 

To download click the link below:  ArcGIS10.1 training Manual2

Mini Review Meeting

Watershed Guidelines Review Mini Meeting On the CBPWD & Pastoral Area Guidelines Review:

Identification of Thematic Areas to Update the Guidelines

 Objective:

To propose thematic areas and suggest contributory professional(s) required to update the guideline, as well as to agree with the identified resource persons to undertake updates of specific thematic areas of the guideline based on their area of expertise, experience and interest.

 The Specific Objectives are:-

  • Reach consensus on:
    • The Proposed Thematic Areas: Identified List of Infotech Technologies & Main Categories;
    • The number and mix of professionals;
  • Officially request organizations to assign nominated and person(s) to engage in the process of the guideline update.
  • Prepare a ToR for the update processes.

Meeting Approach:

Presentation and discussions on the identified thematic areas for the update of the Guidelines. The meeting will be facilitated by the director of the NRMD together with the existing CBPWD Guideline key editor(s).

The Proposed Thematic Areas (with the list of Infotech technologies & Main Categories) and the number and mix of professionals suggested will be discussed, and contributor(s) will be identified and assigned for each thematic area. Finally, a small group of persons will be nominated to prepare a ToR for the update process.

Number of Participants:

The meeting will be held with professionals identified from development partners and invited key professionals as a resource persons to engage in the update of the Guidelines. The proposed persons are from the following organizations: GIZ-SLM, ILIR, IWMI, WFP, FAO, USAID, WB, AAU, WLRC, MoANRs, and private sectors. Approximately 30 (22 invited resource persons, plus 7  from the NRMD) participants are expected to attend the mini meeting.

 Date & Location:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday,  Feb. 21, 2018, from 09:00 – 11:00 AM in the Natural Resource Sector meeting hall of the MoANRs (Bld B, Floor 6).

For Meeting Reference materials Click the links below:

Guideline Review Identification of Thematic Areas

Proceedings of Guideline Review Consultation Workshop

Does Intensive Tillage Enhance Productivity and Reduce Risk Exposure? Panel Data Evidence from Smallholders’ Agriculture in Ethiopia

Does Intensive Tillage Enhance Productivity and Reduce Risk Exposure? Panel Data Evidence from Smallholders’ Agriculture in Ethiopia

Abro, Zewdu Ayalew, Moti Jaleta and Hailemariam Teklewold
Environment for Development (EfD) Initiative: February 2018

This study analyses the impact of intensity of tillage on wheat productivity and risk exposure using panel household-plot level data from Ethiopia. The results suggest that smallholder farmers use tillage as an ex-ante risk management strategy. The main policy implication of this study is that the opportunity cost of switching to reduced tillage in wheat production seem rather high unless farmers are supported by appropriate incentive schemes.

For More Information or request a copy from the author use the link below:

http://www.efdinitiative.org/publications/does-intensive-tillage-enhance-productivity-and-reduce-risk-exposure-panel-data